-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
first batch of filing ToDos and FIXMEs as tickets.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
next set processed.
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ | |||
//! The pool is able to return an iterator that traverses transaction | |||
//! graph in the correct order taking into account priorities and dependencies. | |||
//! | |||
//! TODO [ToDr] | |||
//! FIXME [ToDr] | |||
//! - [ ] Multi-threading (getting ready transactions should not block the pool) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should remove these two lines.
core/trie/src/trie_stream.rs
Outdated
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ impl trie_root::TrieStream for TrieStream { | |||
_ => { | |||
// println!("[append_substream] would have hashed, because data.len() = {}", data.len()); | |||
// data.encode_to(&mut self.buffer) | |||
// TODO: re-enable hashing before merging | |||
// FIXME: re-enable hashing before merging |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
clearly old comments. let's remove
@@ -305,7 +305,6 @@ impl<B: ChainApi> Pool<B> { | |||
|
|||
impl<B: ChainApi> Pool<B> { | |||
/// Create a new transaction pool. | |||
/// TODO [ToDr] Options |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one is actually still valid, logged here: #1579
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for logging, @tomusdrw but do you think this needs a code comment here as well? I think the ticket is more than fine enough :) .
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it's not needed. I'm actually tacking the issue right away anyway :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, but I'm not sure if I'm happy with loosing clickable links to issues^^
Went through the TODOs, removed a bunch, which are outdated or nothing more than a regular comment, documented a bunch more as actual tickets and made them FIXMEs and unified their structure (`FIXME #TICKETNO DESC` for local tickets, `FIXME: DESC LINK` for external tickets) for easier in-editor support. Further more remove unnecessary remarks and related old code that I noticed in that instance.
Went through the TODOs, removed a bunch, which are outdated or nothing more than a regular comment, documented a bunch more as actual tickets and made them FIXMEs and unified their structure (`FIXME #TICKETNO DESC` for local tickets, `FIXME: DESC LINK` for external tickets) for easier in-editor support. Further more remove unnecessary remarks and related old code that I noticed in that instance.
Went through the TODOs, removed a bunch, which are outdated or nothing more than a regular comment, documented a bunch more as actual tickets and made them FIXMEs and unified their structure (
FIXME #TICKETNO DESC
for local tickets,FIXME: DESC LINK
for external tickets) for easier in-editor support. Further more remove unnecessary remarks and related old code that I noticed in that instance.