Skip to content

Blog post about unified operators #997

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 11, 2025

Conversation

cometkim
Copy link
Member

@cometkim cometkim commented Apr 4, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 4, 2025

@cometkim is attempting to deploy a commit to the ReScript Association Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Co-authored-by: Florian Hammerschmidt <[email protected]>
@cometkim cometkim requested a review from fhammerschmidt April 5, 2025 16:30
@cometkim
Copy link
Member Author

cometkim commented Apr 5, 2025

I've revised the section about the roadmap on comparison operators to avoid confusion

@fhammerschmidt
Copy link
Member

Example function names should all be camel case.

@cometkim
Copy link
Member Author

Done, and updated the date

Co-authored-by: Florian Hammerschmidt <[email protected]>
@cometkim
Copy link
Member Author

Need more updates?

@fhammerschmidt fhammerschmidt merged commit f004fa4 into rescript-lang:master Apr 11, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@cometkim cometkim deleted the blog-unified-ops branch April 11, 2025 16:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants