Fix rebuild_sub_package_then_while_package on HFS. #7865
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @Eh2406 (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors: r+ |
|
📌 Commit da8d174 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2020
…e, r=alexcrichton Fix rebuild_sub_package_then_while_package on HFS. This test was flaky on HFS ([azure failure](https://dev.azure.com/rust-lang/cargo/_build/results?buildId=20144&view=logs&j=a5e52b91-c83f-5429-4a68-c246fc63a4f7&t=d4864165-4be3-5e34-b483-a6b05303aa68&l=2018)), resulting in this error: ``` Compiling foo v0.0.1 (/Users/runner/runners/2.164.7/work/1/s/target/cit/t750/foo) error[E0460]: found possibly newer version of crate `b` which `a` depends on --> src/lib.rs:1:1 | 1 | extern crate a; extern crate b; pub fn toplevel() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: perhaps that crate needs to be recompiled? = note: the following crate versions were found: crate `b`: /Users/runner/runners/2.164.7/work/1/s/target/cit/t750/foo/target/debug/deps/libb-98160c67a5811c37.rlib crate `b`: /Users/runner/runners/2.164.7/work/1/s/target/cit/t750/foo/target/debug/deps/libb-98160c67a5811c37.rmeta crate `a`: /Users/runner/runners/2.164.7/work/1/s/target/cit/t750/foo/target/debug/deps/liba-7d2b9ccd932a36e9.rmeta ``` There are two race-condition bugs here. Race 1: The second cargo build command (`cargo build -pb`) would sometimes not build, because it thought `b` is fresh. This can happen when the first build finishes and changing `b/src/lib.rs` happen within the same second. (#5918) The test silently ignored this failure, this is not the cause of the CI failure, though. Race 2: The first and second build commands work as expected. The third build command fails because it thinks both `a` and `b` are "fresh". However, `b` was just rebuilt, and `a` depends on it, so `a` should have been rebuilt. It thinks `a` is fresh because `a`'s mtime is equal to `b` when `b` finishes compiling within the same second that the first build finished. The solution here is to make sure the second step happens well after the first. The underlying problem is #5918.
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This test was flaky on HFS (azure failure), resulting in this error:
There are two race-condition bugs here.
Race 1: The second cargo build command (
cargo build -pb) would sometimes not build, because it thoughtbis fresh. This can happen when the first build finishes and changingb/src/lib.rshappen within the same second. (#5918) The test silently ignored this failure, this is not the cause of the CI failure, though.Race 2: The first and second build commands work as expected. The third build command fails because it thinks both
aandbare "fresh". However,bwas just rebuilt, andadepends on it, soashould have been rebuilt. It thinksais fresh becausea's mtime is equal tobwhenbfinishes compiling within the same second that the first build finished.The solution here is to make sure the second step happens well after the first. The underlying problem is #5918.