libstd: init(): dup() subsequent /dev/nulls instead of opening them again #137494

nabijaczleweli · 2025-02-23T18:44:53Z

This will be faster, and also it deduplicates the code so win/win

The dup() is actually infallible here. But whatever.

Before:

poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 1 ([{fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}])
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR)   = 2
rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f5749313050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0

poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 2 ([{fd=0, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}])
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR)   = 0
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR)   = 2
rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7efe12006050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0

poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 3 ([{fd=0, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}])
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR)   = 0
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR)   = 1
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR)   = 2
rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7fc2dc7ca050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0

After:

poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 1 ([{fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}])
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR)   = 1
rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f488a3fb050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0

poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 2 ([{fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}])
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR)   = 1
dup(1)                                  = 2
rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f1a8943c050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0

poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 3 ([{fd=0, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}])
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR)   = 0
dup(0)                                  = 1
dup(0)                                  = 2
rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f4e3a4c7050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0

rustbot · 2025-02-23T18:45:00Z

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

…gain This will be faster, and also it deduplicates the code so win/win The dup() is actually infallible here. But whatever. Before: poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 1 ([{fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f5749313050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 2 ([{fd=0, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 0 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7efe12006050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 3 ([{fd=0, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 0 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 1 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7fc2dc7ca050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 After: poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 1 ([{fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 1 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f488a3fb050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 2 ([{fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 1 dup(1) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f1a8943c050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 3 ([{fd=0, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 0 dup(0) = 1 dup(0) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f4e3a4c7050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0

library/std/src/sys/pal/unix/mod.rs

Mark-Simulacrum · 2025-03-23T16:19:52Z

@bors r+

bors · 2025-03-23T16:19:55Z

📌 Commit 4983fda has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

bors · 2025-03-24T00:13:11Z

⌛ Testing commit 4983fda with merge 0ed75ff...

libstd: init(): dup() subsequent /dev/nulls instead of opening them again This will be faster, and also it deduplicates the code so win/win The dup() is actually infallible here. But whatever. Before: ``` poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 1 ([{fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f5749313050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 2 ([{fd=0, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 0 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7efe12006050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 3 ([{fd=0, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 0 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 1 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7fc2dc7ca050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 ``` After: ``` poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 1 ([{fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 1 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f488a3fb050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 2 ([{fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 1 dup(1) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f1a8943c050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 3 ([{fd=0, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 0 dup(0) = 1 dup(0) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f4e3a4c7050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 ```

bors · 2025-03-24T01:02:14Z

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

nabijaczleweli · 2025-03-24T01:08:15Z

2025-03-24T00:18:44.8332744Z AR_x86_64_unknown_fuchsia=x86_64-unknown-fuchsia-ar \

😔

nabijaczleweli · 2025-03-24T01:13:46Z

Please for the love of god tell me I'm not annotating both lets with

        #[cfg(not(any(
            miri,
            target_os = "emscripten",
            target_os = "fuchsia",
            target_os = "vxworks",
            target_os = "redox",
            target_os = "l4re",
            target_os = "horizon",
            target_os = "vita",
            target_os = "rtems",
            // The poll on Darwin doesn't set POLLNVAL for closed fds.
            target_vendor = "apple",
        )))]

Mark-Simulacrum · 2025-04-12T14:10:04Z

@bors r+

bors · 2025-04-12T14:10:06Z

📌 Commit c73cfb8 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

libstd: init(): dup() subsequent /dev/nulls instead of opening them again This will be faster, and also it deduplicates the code so win/win The dup() is actually infallible here. But whatever. Before: ``` poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 1 ([{fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f5749313050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 2 ([{fd=0, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 0 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7efe12006050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 3 ([{fd=0, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 0 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 1 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7fc2dc7ca050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 ``` After: ``` poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 1 ([{fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 1 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f488a3fb050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 2 ([{fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 1 dup(1) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f1a8943c050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 poll([{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=1, events=0}, {fd=2, events=0}], 3, 0) = 3 ([{fd=0, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=1, revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=2, revents=POLLNVAL}]) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", O_RDWR) = 0 dup(0) = 1 dup(0) = 2 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[PIPE], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, sa_restorer=0x7f4e3a4c7050}, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 8) = 0 ```

…enton Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#137494 (libstd: init(): dup() subsequent /dev/nulls instead of opening them again) - rust-lang#138881 (Use the chaining methods on PartialOrd for slices too) - rust-lang#138972 (std: Fix build for NuttX targets) - rust-lang#139107 (std: make `cmath` functions safe) - rust-lang#139607 (Add regression test for rust-lang#127424) - rust-lang#139691 (Document that `opt-dist` requires metrics to be enabled) - rust-lang#139707 (Fix comment in bootstrap) - rust-lang#139708 (Fix name of field in doc comment) - rust-lang#139709 (bootstrap: fix typo in doc string) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

ChrisDenton · 2025-04-12T20:58:57Z

Failed in rollup #139717 (comment)

@bors r-

nabijaczleweli · 2025-04-12T21:22:59Z

Works on CI but doesn't work on CI. Added more of the #[allow]s listed in the log. Hopefully that makes it work on CI and work on CI.

rustbot assigned Mark-Simulacrum Feb 23, 2025

rustbot added O-unix Operating system: Unix-like S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 23, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

nabijaczleweli force-pushed the dup branch from 729a7fb to 4983fda Compare February 23, 2025 19:22

Mark-Simulacrum reviewed Mar 15, 2025

View reviewed changes

library/std/src/sys/pal/unix/mod.rs Show resolved Hide resolved

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 23, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 24, 2025

nabijaczleweli force-pushed the dup branch from 48984d6 to 3838860 Compare March 24, 2025 01:19

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

nabijaczleweli force-pushed the dup branch from 3838860 to 4615eed Compare March 24, 2025 01:29

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

nabijaczleweli force-pushed the dup branch from 4615eed to ffed59d Compare March 24, 2025 01:41

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

nabijaczleweli force-pushed the dup branch from ffed59d to f51e0e7 Compare March 24, 2025 02:00

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

nabijaczleweli force-pushed the dup branch from f51e0e7 to 9ab2897 Compare March 24, 2025 02:50

#[allow(dead_code)]

c73cfb8

nabijaczleweli force-pushed the dup branch from 9ab2897 to c73cfb8 Compare March 26, 2025 01:08

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 12, 2025

ChrisDenton mentioned this pull request Apr 12, 2025

Rollup of 9 pull requests #139717

Closed

bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Apr 12, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rust-lang#139717 (comment) 🥴

ac761f2

nabijaczleweli force-pushed the dup branch from a2e3d47 to ac761f2 Compare April 12, 2025 21:38

thaliaarchi mentioned this pull request Apr 13, 2025

std: Fix build for NuttX targets #138972

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

libstd: init(): dup() subsequent /dev/nulls instead of opening them again #137494

libstd: init(): dup() subsequent /dev/nulls instead of opening them again #137494

nabijaczleweli commented Feb 23, 2025

rustbot commented Feb 23, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Mark-Simulacrum commented Mar 23, 2025

bors commented Mar 23, 2025

bors commented Mar 24, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

bors commented Mar 24, 2025

nabijaczleweli commented Mar 24, 2025

nabijaczleweli commented Mar 24, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

Mark-Simulacrum commented Apr 12, 2025

bors commented Apr 12, 2025

ChrisDenton commented Apr 12, 2025

nabijaczleweli commented Apr 12, 2025 •

edited

Loading

This comment has been minimized.

libstd: init(): dup() subsequent /dev/nulls instead of opening them again #137494

Are you sure you want to change the base?

libstd: init(): dup() subsequent /dev/nulls instead of opening them again #137494

Conversation

nabijaczleweli commented Feb 23, 2025

rustbot commented Feb 23, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Mark-Simulacrum commented Mar 23, 2025

bors commented Mar 23, 2025

bors commented Mar 24, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

bors commented Mar 24, 2025

nabijaczleweli commented Mar 24, 2025

nabijaczleweli commented Mar 24, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

Mark-Simulacrum commented Apr 12, 2025

bors commented Apr 12, 2025

ChrisDenton commented Apr 12, 2025

nabijaczleweli commented Apr 12, 2025 • edited Loading

This comment has been minimized.

nabijaczleweli commented Apr 12, 2025 •

edited

Loading