Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cbor integration #172

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 31, 2025
Merged

Cbor integration #172

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 31, 2025

Conversation

maxwellflitton
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for submitting this pull request! We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes.

What is the motivation?

Support for cbor and None

Type of Change

  • 📚 Examples / docs / tutorials / dependencies update
  • 🔧 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • 🥂 Improvement (non-breaking change which improves an existing feature)
  • 🚀 New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🔐 Security fix

What does this change do?

Native python cbor is now implemented in the python client. Because of this None type is serialized with the correct tag for the surrealDB server.

What is your testing strategy?

wrote a test for None serialization and how it implements the

Is this related to any issues?

issue 161

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?

@maxwellflitton maxwellflitton merged commit 375f543 into main Mar 31, 2025
24 checks passed
@maxwellflitton maxwellflitton deleted the cbor-integration branch March 31, 2025 11:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant