Skip to content

Revert "Copy helpers internally" again #8494

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 14, 2025

Conversation

pmattos
Copy link
Contributor

@pmattos pmattos commented Apr 12, 2025

Motivation:

Pull request #8476 was breaking SwiftPM builds in Xcode (i.e., the package resolution step):

Modifications:

This reverts commit 1d48e0a.

@pmattos pmattos changed the title Revert "Copy helpers internally (#8476)" Revert "Copy helpers internally" again Apr 12, 2025
@pmattos pmattos force-pushed the pmattos/revert-copy-helpers-internally branch from 6302dbc to eefa588 Compare April 12, 2025 17:49
@pmattos
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmattos commented Apr 12, 2025

@swift-ci test

@pmattos
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmattos commented Apr 13, 2025

@swift-ci test

@pmattos
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmattos commented Apr 13, 2025

@swift-ci test macOS

1 similar comment
@pmattos
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmattos commented Apr 14, 2025

@swift-ci test macOS

@pmattos
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmattos commented Apr 14, 2025

@swift-ci test windows

@bkhouri
Copy link
Contributor

bkhouri commented Apr 14, 2025

@swift-ci test macOS

@bkhouri
Copy link
Contributor

bkhouri commented Apr 14, 2025

@swift-ci test self hosted windows

@pmattos
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmattos commented Apr 14, 2025

@swift-ci test macOS

@shahmishal shahmishal merged commit 49e69c7 into main Apr 14, 2025
4 of 6 checks passed
@shahmishal shahmishal deleted the pmattos/revert-copy-helpers-internally branch April 14, 2025 16:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants