-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
if --with_boost is specified, search *only* the specified directory h… #82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
I just discovered a problem on OS X; am working on a fix. |
I've updated the code to fix the problem. Should be good to go. |
…ierarchy for libraries. Arguably, if --with_boost is specified, the user wants to use only that boost installation, and no other. This changeset implements this behavior. The original code in _BOOST_FIND_LIBS prepended the --with_boost path to the default list of paths, resulting in all of the paths being searched if the library wasn't found in that specified by --with_boost. Because the search for a library begins with the most specialized version: boost_$boost_lib_$boost_tag_$boost_mt_$boost_rtopt_$boost_ver_ boost_$boost_lib_$boost_tag_$boost_rtopt_$boost_ver_ boost_$boost_lib_$boost_tag_$boost_mt_$boost_ver_ boost_$boost_lib_$boost_tag_$boost_ver_ if the user's preferred boost installation has a less specialized version of a library than one provided in the default path, the latter will be chosen instead. This may lead to a mismatch between the headers discovered in the --with_boost hierarchy and the library discovered in the default path, if they are for different versions of boost, leading to link problems if the latter is for an earlier version . Additionally, this will silently invalidate a request for a specific version of boost in BOOST_REQUIRE, as it will be fulfilled by the headers, but not by the library. The new code does the following: * It will only search the --with_boost hierarchy if that is provided; * It will (following the suggestion of issue tsuna#49 by mateidavid) use the absolute path to the library so that the linker's default library paths are not searched if the library is not found in the --with_boost hierarchy * It adds a second path "$with_boost/lib" to the search path, as that seems to be a standard place for libraries N.B. There is still a potential for mishap if --with_boost is *not* specified, namely that if there exist multiple boost installations and some do not have all of the libraries, it is possible to end up with libraries selected from multiple installations.
shrext_cmds is actually a quoted set of commands to generate the shared library extension, not the actual shrext itself (regardless of it initially being set directly to .so as a default).
boost_cv_inc_path can have values 'yes' and 'no' in addition to a real path, so don't use it to generate an ldpath if it's 'yes' or 'no'
If the tested ldpath = '', using it to create an absolute path to a library leads to a path in the root directory, which isn't what's intended. So don't. Additionally if ldpath = '', it's equivalent to letting the linker use only the system default paths, and there's no way of knowing in which directory the linker might find the library.
I've rebased the code on current master, and fixed a couple of bugs, one of which led to problems on systems where the default search path for libraries wasn't covered by the directories explicitly searched (e.g. on Debian 10 with multi-arch, where libraries are in |
provided. Needed to avoid pulling in old multi-threaded variants on TACC's frontera system that are incompatible with intel compiler. Based on PR from tsuna/boost.m4#82
if --with_boost is specified, search only the specified directory hierarchy for libraries.
Arguably, if --with_boost is specified, the user wants to use only
that boost installation, and no other. This changeset implements this
behavior.
The original code in _BOOST_FIND_LIBS prepended the --with_boost path
to the default list of paths, resulting in all of the paths being
searched if the library wasn't found in that specified by
--with_boost. Because the search for a library begins with the most
specialized version:
if the user's preferred boost installation has a less specialized
version of a library than one provided in the default path, the latter
will be chosen instead.
This may lead to a mismatch between the headers discovered in the
--with_boost hierarchy and the library discovered in the default path,
if they are for different versions of boost, leading to link problems
if the latter is for an earlier version .
Additionally, this will silently invalidate a request for a specific
version of boost in BOOST_REQUIRE, as it will be fulfilled by the
headers, but not by the library.
The new code does the following:
absolute path to the library so that the linker's default
library paths are not searched if the library is not found in the
--with_boost hierarchy
seems to be a standard place for libraries
N.B. There is still a potential for mishap if --with_boost is not
specified, namely that if there exist multiple boost installations and
some do not have all of the libraries, it is possible to end up with
libraries selected from multiple installations.