[Misc] make get_class check for Executor instead of ExecutorBase

[andyxning]

Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist

• The purpose of the PR, such as "Fix some issue (link existing issues this PR will resolve)".
• The test plan, such as providing test command.
• The test results, such as pasting the results comparison before and after, or e2e results
• (Optional) The necessary documentation update, such as updating supported_models.md and examples for a new model.

Purpose

executor_class is of type Executor, so get_class should also validate against Executor instead of ExecutorBase

Test Plan

NA

Test Result

NA

(Optional) Documentation Update

[github-actions]

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @andyxning, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a minor but important refinement to the type validation logic within the get_class function, ensuring that the distributed executor backend is correctly checked against the Executor class. It also includes a small documentation fix for improved clarity.

Highlights

• Type Validation Refinement: The get_class function in vllm/v1/executor/abstract.py has been updated to validate the distributed_executor_backend against the Executor class instead of ExecutorBase. This ensures that the type check aligns with the actual Executor type that executor_class is expected to be.
• Documentation Correction: A comment on line 33 in vllm/v1/executor/abstract.py was corrected to accurately state that distributed_executor_backend is set in ParallelConfig.__post_init__, not VllmConfig.__post_init__.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request makes a couple of precise improvements in vllm/v1/executor/abstract.py:

1. It updates the type check for a custom distributed_executor_backend to ensure it's a subclass of the V1 Executor, aligning with the function's return type annotation. This enhances type safety.
2. It corrects a comment to accurately reflect that distributed_executor_backend is initialized within ParallelConfig.__post_init__.

Both changes contribute to better code correctness and clarity. The reasoning provided in the PR description is sound. Good job!

[gemini-code-assist]

This change from ExecutorBase to Executor in the issubclass check is a good refinement.

The get_class function is type-hinted to return type["Executor"] (which refers to vllm.v1.executor.abstract.Executor). By ensuring that a custom distributed_executor_backend (if it's a type) is a subclass of this V1 Executor, you're making the type check more precise and consistent with the function's intended return type.

The previous check against ExecutorBase was broader and could potentially allow an executor type that isn't a V1 Executor, which might lead to inconsistencies or runtime issues if the caller specifically expects a V1 Executor's interface.

This improves the type safety and correctness for custom executor configurations.

[andyxning]

@comaniac @njhill ptal.