[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.11-slim to 3.13.2-slim

[rubenfiszel]

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the dockerfile dependencies of this project.

Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

• lsp/Dockerfile

We recommend upgrading to python:3.13.2-slim, as this image has only 39 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

	Issue	Score
	Integer Overflow or Wraparound SNYK-DEBIAN12-ZLIB-6008963	500
	Reversible One-Way Hash SNYK-DEBIAN12-KRB5-9712315	150
	Reversible One-Way Hash SNYK-DEBIAN12-KRB5-9712315	150
	Reversible One-Way Hash SNYK-DEBIAN12-KRB5-9712315	150
	Reversible One-Way Hash SNYK-DEBIAN12-KRB5-9712315	150

---

Important

• Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
• Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
• This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

---

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic

---

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Reversible One-Way Hash

---

Important

Upgrade Docker base image to python:3.13.2-slim in lsp/Dockerfile to fix security vulnerabilities.

• Dockerfile Update:
  • Upgrade base image from python:3.11-slim to python:3.13.2-slim in lsp/Dockerfile.
  • Addresses vulnerabilities: Integer Overflow in zlib and Reversible One-Way Hash in krb5.
  • Reduces known vulnerabilities from previous image.

^{This description was created by for 8912599. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying windmill with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	8912599
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://d0d452b7.windmill.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://snyk-fix-1feafba62039d4629c2.windmill.pages.dev

View logs

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 8912599 in 52 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 10 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 2 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. lsp/Dockerfile:1

• Draft comment:
  Python base image upgraded to 3.13.2-slim. Ensure compatibility with project dependencies and test thoroughly.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is asking the PR author to ensure compatibility and test thoroughly, which violates the rule against asking for confirmation or testing. It does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue.

2. lsp/Dockerfile:1

• Draft comment:
  Upgraded base image from python:3.11-slim to python:3.13.2-slim. Ensure that all dependencies and your application code work correctly with Python 3.13.2. Also, consider pinning this image by digest for reproducible builds.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 50% <= threshold 50% The comment is related to a dependency change, specifically the base image version. It advises ensuring compatibility with the new Python version and suggests pinning the image for reproducibility. However, the first part of the comment violates the rule against asking the author to ensure compatibility, which is not allowed. The suggestion to pin the image is a valid code suggestion.

Workflow ID: wflow_OVQArfR8YKSMWfpc

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}