-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 368
Test #3508 #3512
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test #3508 #3512
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Be a legend 🏆 by adding a before and after screenshot of the changes you made, especially if they are around UI/UX. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis change introduces multiple debug logging statements into two asynchronous methods: Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant MainViewModel
participant PluginManager
participant Logger
MainViewModel->>Logger: Debug log (start QueryTaskAsync)
MainViewModel->>PluginManager: QueryForPluginAsync
PluginManager->>Logger: Debug log (enter QueryForPluginAsync)
PluginManager->>Logger: Debug log (after stopwatch start)
PluginManager->>Logger: Debug log (after cancellation check)
PluginManager->>Logger: Debug log (after null check)
PluginManager->>Logger: Debug log (after updating metadata)
PluginManager->>Logger: Debug log (after updating query count/time)
PluginManager-->>MainViewModel: Plugin query result
MainViewModel->>Logger: Debug log (after plugin query)
MainViewModel->>Logger: Debug log (after cancellation check)
MainViewModel->>Logger: Debug log (after cloning results)
MainViewModel->>Logger: Debug log (after setting badge icon paths)
MainViewModel->>Logger: Debug log (before writing results)
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@check-spelling-bot Report🔴 Please reviewSee the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.
See ❌ Event descriptions for more information. If the flagged items are 🤯 false positivesIf items relate to a ...
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (5)
Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs (5)
1350-1350
: Duplicate: Use descriptive logging
As noted above, the numeric2
should be replaced with a meaningful debug statement indicating the exact execution point and plugin context.
1354-1354
: Duplicate: Use descriptive logging
The numeric3
offers no insight; use a clear message such as"QueryTaskAsync – plugin <Name> returned results"
.
1358-1358
: Duplicate: Use descriptive logging
Replace the numeric4
with a log that reflects the cancellation check or next processing step for the given plugin.
1371-1371
: Duplicate: Use descriptive logging
Instead of5
, log a message indicating post-cloning of results for the current plugin.
1381-1381
: Duplicate: Use descriptive logging
The numeric6
should be swapped for a descriptive statement before enqueuing the results update, including plugin metadata.
🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs (8)
280-281
: Use descriptive debug message instead of single character
The current logAPI.LogDebug(ClassName, $"a")
is too generic. Consider replacing it with a clear message, for example:- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"a"); + API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Starting query for plugin <{pair.Metadata.Name}>");
287-288
: Clarify debug log for plugin invocation
The logAPI.LogDebug(ClassName, $"b")
offers no context. Replace it with something like:- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"b"); + API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Invoking QueryAsync on <{metadata.Name}>");
292-293
: Improve traceability of stopwatch completion
API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"c")
doesn’t describe what just happened. For example:- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"c"); + API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] QueryAsync completed for <{metadata.Name}> in {milliseconds}ms");
295-296
: Add context after cancellation check
The logAPI.LogDebug(ClassName, $"d")
should indicate the cancellation checkpoint. E.g.:- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"d"); + API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Cancellation check passed for <{metadata.Name}>");
301-302
: Detail null/empty result branch in debug logs
API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"e")
is too vague. A more descriptive message could convey the result count:- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"e"); + API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Retrieved {results?.Count ?? 0} result(s) from <{metadata.Name}>");
305-306
: Annotate metadata update occurrence
API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"f")
doesn’t say what was updated. Use:- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"f"); + API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Updated metadata (QueryCount={metadata.QueryCount}, AvgTime={metadata.AvgQueryTime}ms) for <{metadata.Name}>");
312-313
: Indicate finalization of plugin query
API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"g")
should reflect that the method is about to complete:- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"g"); + API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Finalizing results for <{metadata.Name}>");
317-318
: Clarify log inside cancellation catch block
Inside theOperationCanceledException
catch,API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"h")
is too vague. Prefer:- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"h"); + API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Query canceled for <{metadata.Name}>");
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs
(2 hunks)Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs
(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
- GitHub Check: gitStream workflow automation
- GitHub Check: gitStream workflow automation
- GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
- GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
- GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
- GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
- GitHub Check: build
…d of _updateSource.Token
Test for #3508.