Skip to content

Test #3508 #3512

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Test #3508 #3512

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

Jack251970
Copy link
Contributor

Test for #3508.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented May 5, 2025

Be a legend 🏆 by adding a before and after screenshot of the changes you made, especially if they are around UI/UX.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 5, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This change introduces multiple debug logging statements into two asynchronous methods: QueryForPluginAsync within the PluginManager class and QueryTaskAsync (a local method inside QueryResultsAsync) within the MainViewModel class. The logs are strategically placed at key points in each method to trace the execution flow, including before and after major operations, cancellation checks, and result handling. Additionally, a new private CancellationToken field _updateToken is added in MainViewModel to prevent ObjectDisposedException by replacing usages of _updateSource.Token. No modifications were made to the core logic, error handling, or public interfaces; the updates are limited to debug tracing and token management improvements.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs Added multiple debug log statements at key points within QueryForPluginAsync to trace execution flow.
Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs Added private field _updateToken to avoid ObjectDisposedException; replaced _updateSource.Token with _updateToken; inserted debug logging in local QueryTaskAsync method for detailed runtime tracing.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant MainViewModel
    participant PluginManager
    participant Logger

    MainViewModel->>Logger: Debug log (start QueryTaskAsync)
    MainViewModel->>PluginManager: QueryForPluginAsync
    PluginManager->>Logger: Debug log (enter QueryForPluginAsync)
    PluginManager->>Logger: Debug log (after stopwatch start)
    PluginManager->>Logger: Debug log (after cancellation check)
    PluginManager->>Logger: Debug log (after null check)
    PluginManager->>Logger: Debug log (after updating metadata)
    PluginManager->>Logger: Debug log (after updating query count/time)
    PluginManager-->>MainViewModel: Plugin query result
    MainViewModel->>Logger: Debug log (after plugin query)
    MainViewModel->>Logger: Debug log (after cancellation check)
    MainViewModel->>Logger: Debug log (after cloning results)
    MainViewModel->>Logger: Debug log (after setting badge icon paths)
    MainViewModel->>Logger: Debug log (before writing results)
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

bug

Suggested reviewers

  • taooceros

Poem

🐇✨ Logs hop in, one by one,
Tracing paths till work is done.
Tokens safe, no errors near,
Debugging’s clear, the way is clear!
With every log, the code’s delight—
A rabbit’s cheer, in soft moonlight! 🌙🐰


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e6773ab and 736086a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs (11 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

This comment has been minimized.

@Jack251970 Jack251970 added the Dev branch only An issue or fix for the Dev branch build label May 5, 2025
@Jack251970 Jack251970 changed the title Add test codes Test #3508 May 5, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 5, 2025

@check-spelling-bot Report

🔴 Please review

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.

❌ Errors and Warnings Count
❌ forbidden-pattern 22
⚠️ non-alpha-in-dictionary 19

See ❌ Event descriptions for more information.

If the flagged items are 🤯 false positives

If items relate to a ...

  • binary file (or some other file you wouldn't want to check at all).

    Please add a file path to the excludes.txt file matching the containing file.

    File paths are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your files.

    ^ refers to the file's path from the root of the repository, so ^README\.md$ would exclude README.md (on whichever branch you're using).

  • well-formed pattern.

    If you can write a pattern that would match it,
    try adding it to the patterns.txt file.

    Patterns are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your lines.

    Note that patterns can't match multiline strings.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (5)
Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs (5)

1350-1350: Duplicate: Use descriptive logging
As noted above, the numeric 2 should be replaced with a meaningful debug statement indicating the exact execution point and plugin context.


1354-1354: Duplicate: Use descriptive logging
The numeric 3 offers no insight; use a clear message such as "QueryTaskAsync – plugin <Name> returned results".


1358-1358: Duplicate: Use descriptive logging
Replace the numeric 4 with a log that reflects the cancellation check or next processing step for the given plugin.


1371-1371: Duplicate: Use descriptive logging
Instead of 5, log a message indicating post-cloning of results for the current plugin.


1381-1381: Duplicate: Use descriptive logging
The numeric 6 should be swapped for a descriptive statement before enqueuing the results update, including plugin metadata.

🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs (8)

280-281: Use descriptive debug message instead of single character
The current log API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"a") is too generic. Consider replacing it with a clear message, for example:

- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"a");
+ API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Starting query for plugin <{pair.Metadata.Name}>");

287-288: Clarify debug log for plugin invocation
The log API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"b") offers no context. Replace it with something like:

- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"b");
+ API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Invoking QueryAsync on <{metadata.Name}>");

292-293: Improve traceability of stopwatch completion
API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"c") doesn’t describe what just happened. For example:

- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"c");
+ API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] QueryAsync completed for <{metadata.Name}> in {milliseconds}ms");

295-296: Add context after cancellation check
The log API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"d") should indicate the cancellation checkpoint. E.g.:

- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"d");
+ API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Cancellation check passed for <{metadata.Name}>");

301-302: Detail null/empty result branch in debug logs
API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"e") is too vague. A more descriptive message could convey the result count:

- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"e");
+ API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Retrieved {results?.Count ?? 0} result(s) from <{metadata.Name}>");

305-306: Annotate metadata update occurrence
API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"f") doesn’t say what was updated. Use:

- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"f");
+ API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Updated metadata (QueryCount={metadata.QueryCount}, AvgTime={metadata.AvgQueryTime}ms) for <{metadata.Name}>");

312-313: Indicate finalization of plugin query
API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"g") should reflect that the method is about to complete:

- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"g");
+ API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Finalizing results for <{metadata.Name}>");

317-318: Clarify log inside cancellation catch block
Inside the OperationCanceledException catch, API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"h") is too vague. Prefer:

- API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"h");
+ API.LogDebug(ClassName, $"[QueryForPluginAsync] Query canceled for <{metadata.Name}>");
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4ecea0 and cbaf76f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs (2 hunks)
  • Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: gitStream workflow automation
  • GitHub Check: gitStream workflow automation
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: build

@Jack251970 Jack251970 closed this May 6, 2025
@Jack251970 Jack251970 deleted the test_program_missing branch May 6, 2025 05:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1 min review Dev branch only An issue or fix for the Dev branch build
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant