-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Conversation
Successful build log: https://travis-ci.com/github/janaknat/pywavelets-wheels/builds/186105041 |
Thanks @janaknat I know multibuild has moved away from using Rackspace for storing wheels, but haven't tried using it since that change was made. I will try to take a look later and see if just updating multibuild is sufficient for solving that or if there are any other changes needed on our end. |
@grlee77 One of the needs for updating multibuild was that
in .travis.yml does not understand the PLAT=aarch64 option in older versions of multibuild. That command is found under travis_linux_steps.sh and was updated to recognize aarch64. There were other build issues with the older version which I didn't see on updating to the newer version. Also, I ran the build again on travis-ci.org. In the link I posted before, it was running in travis-ci.com. |
@grlee77 Were you able to check the new version of multibuild? |
@grlee77 Thanks! |
Can you rebase on master now that #13 was merged? |
@grlee77 I've rebased to master. A large chunk of time is spent on building numpy. Is it feasible to have a dependency on numpy>=1.19.1? That is the version that started shipping aarch64 wheels. |
That seems okay to me. I think that would be consistent with how the other NumPy pinnings are currently set (the pinnings are the oldest NumPy release that had x86 wheels available for a given version of Python). |
@grlee77 Okay, I'll update the branch to use the latest numpy. |
Gah! Have a typo. Resend again. Apologies. |
Thanks, I will go ahead and merge this and see if the new wheels end up at multibuild-wheels-staging as expected |
@grlee77 Thanks for merging. Is there a timeline for when the wheels will be available on PyPI? |
@rgommers: Do you have any objection to downloading the v1.1.1 AArch64 wheels from multibuild-wheels-staging and and uploading them to PyPI? I saw you were hesitant to add new wheels to an existing release for SciPy (scipy/scipy#11170 (comment)). I am inclined to try it and if it causes any problems we can remove the wheels and wait until the subsequent release. |
Yes, I think we can try it. The risk is low, and PyWavelets is much smaller than SciPy so it's not likely this will cause problems for anyone. Thanks for working on this. |
Thanks Ralf! @janaknat: These AArch64 wheels are now on PyPI. |
Travis-CI allows for the creation of aarch64 wheels.
Note: