-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
Add missing JS scope facets #2890
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this code:
class Aaa {
bbb() {
ccc;
}
ddd() {}
}
Will "every funk name cap"
still return bbb
and ddd
?
No... I'm wondering if |
Yeah maybe we remove those? Where are they used? I mean I can see the use case in certain scenarios but it's a bummer to lose every funk within a method |
This is the only instance before this pull request: https://github.com/cursorless-dev/cursorless/blob/49cc8cdb89ce19450f3cd41015f4a8fd91ebc623/data/fixtures/scopes/scss/namedFunction.iteration.block.scope I definitely agree that every funk should work in a method. The question is just what to do with the facets. Should |
@pokey Ready for another view. I haven't renamed any of the facets. Besides that I'm feel this one is done now. |
No description provided.